Mel Gibson on Joe Rogan: Faith, Controversy, and Catholicism

Mel Gibson’s appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast sparked a wide-ranging discussion that delved deep into his faith, criticisms of Catholicism, and broader reflections on Christianity. The episode provided insights into Gibson’s personal beliefs and his views on the Catholic Church, Pope Francis, and modern societal struggles. Here are my thoughts on this fascinating and controversial conversation.

Mel Gibson’s Faith in Christianity

One of the most powerful moments of the podcast was when Gibson discussed his Christian faith and how it has shaped his life. He spoke about the redemptive nature of Christ’s sacrifice and its universal significance. As Gibson explained, the central theme of his iconic film, The Passion of the Christ, was to highlight humanity’s collective responsibility for Christ’s suffering and the redemptive act of salvation for all mankind.

Gibson also touched on his personal struggles with addiction and credited his faith for helping him overcome them. He described his recovery as miraculous, emphasizing the role of surrendering to a higher power in his transformation. I couldn’t agree more with this perspective. Jesus saves us not only in the afterlife but also in our present struggles if we trust and turn our lives over to Him.

The Shroud of Turin: A Belief in the Miraculous

During the conversation, Gibson expressed his belief in the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin as the burial cloth of Jesus Christ. He cited scientific studies and unique features of the relic, such as its mysterious image and historical consistency, as compelling evidence. I share Gibson’s belief in the Shroud’s authenticity. If we accept the miracle of creation itself, believing in the Shroud’s connection to Christ seems entirely reasonable.

Gibson’s Criticisms of the Catholic Church and Pope Francis

While Gibson’s devotion to Christianity is evident, his criticisms of the Catholic Church and Pope Francis were troubling. Let’s break down his claims and offer counterarguments rooted in scripture, Church Fathers, and historical context.

1. Corruption Within the Church

• Gibson’s Claim: He criticized Church leaders, such as Theodore McCarrick and Cardinal Wuerl, for covering up abuse scandals and described these actions as deeply damaging to the Church’s credibility and morality.
• Response: It is undeniable that some members of the clergy have committed grave sins and damaged the reputation of the Church. However, to dismiss the Church’s divine authority because of human failings is contrary to scripture. In Matthew 16:18, Jesus promises that “the gates of hell shall not prevail” against the Church. St. Augustine reminds us that the Church is a “hospital for sinners,” not a sanctuary for the perfect. Throughout history, God has worked through imperfect leaders—consider St. Peter, who denied Christ three times, yet was chosen to lead the Church. Instead of piling on with the nay-sayers, we should be defending the Church’s authority and calling those searching for truth to the One True Church founded by our Lord Jesus Christ.

2. Post-Vatican II Church as a “Counterfeit Parallel Church”

• Gibson’s Claim: He argued that the Catholic Church after Vatican II has strayed from its original mission and described it as a counterfeit Church.
• Response: The Second Vatican Council was a pastoral council that sought to address the needs of a rapidly changing world. Its documents, such as Lumen Gentium and Gaudium et Spes, reaffirm the Church’s mission to bring the Gospel to all nations. Critics like Gibson often overlook the continuity of doctrine emphasized in these documents. St. John Henry Newman’s theory of the “development of doctrine” teaches us that the Church grows in its understanding of truth without compromising its core teachings. Vatican II was not a rupture but a continuation of the Church’s mission.

3. Apostasy Allegations Against Pope Francis

• Gibson’s Claim: He accused Pope Francis of apostasy, particularly for the Pachamama controversy, likening it to idol worship.
• Response: The Pachamama controversy has been widely misunderstood. The Vatican clarified that the statues were symbols of life and fertility from the Amazon region, not objects of worship. St. Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians 9:22, “I have become all things to all people so that by all possible means I might save some,” remind us of the Church’s responsibility to engage with different cultures while remaining faithful to Christ. Pope Francis’ actions were a gesture of cultural respect, not apostasy.

4. Historical Inconsistencies in Papal Elections

• Gibson’s Claim: He questioned the legitimacy of the election of Pope John XXIII in 1958, citing unusual occurrences during the conclave.
• Response: Speculations about papal elections often stem from misinformation or conspiracy theories. The Church has a well-established process for electing popes, rooted in centuries of tradition. Quoting St. Cyprian, “The Church is the people united with the bishop,” we are reminded that unity under the papacy is central to Catholic faith. Trust in the Holy Spirit’s guidance is essential, even amidst human imperfections.

5. Moral Failures in Leadership

• Gibson’s Claim: He acknowledged the Church’s divine origin but argued that its leaders have often deviated from its mission.
• Response: The Church’s history includes both saints and sinners, yet Christ’s promise of guidance remains steadfast. As St. Ambrose wrote, “Where Peter is, there is the Church.” We must remember that the Church’s holiness comes from Christ, not from the faultless behavior of its members. Our role is to support and pray for our leaders, not to sow division.

Broader Reflections

Cultural Bias Against Christianity

Gibson discussed the societal tendency to mock or criticize Christianity while tolerating or embracing other religions. This double standard reflects a broader cultural bias that often misconstrues Christianity as synonymous with colonialism or oppression. I agree with Gibson on this point—we must challenge these misconceptions and stand firm in our faith.

A Cosmic Battle Between Good and Evil

Gibson’s reflection on the spiritual battle between good and evil was one of the podcast’s most compelling moments. He described this struggle as influencing not only individuals but also institutions like the Church. This aligns with Ephesians 6:12, which reminds us, “Our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world.”

Creation as a Divine Act

Gibson emphasized humanity’s unique creation by God, highlighting the soul as what sets humans apart. He pointed to the historical accounts of Christ and the conviction of the apostles as evidence for his faith. I agree wholeheartedly—our faith is rooted in the profound reality of God’s creative and redemptive work.

My Final Thoughts on Mel Gibson’s Appearance

Mel Gibson’s appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast offered a fascinating glimpse into his faith and worldview. While I admire his passion for Christianity and the incredible work he has done with films like The Passion of the Christ, his harsh criticisms of the Church and Pope Francis are concerning. Quoting St. Ignatius of Antioch, “Wherever the bishop appears, let the people be there; just as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church,” we are reminded to trust in the Church’s divine foundation.

Instead of focusing on division, we should strive to build up the Body of Christ. Gibson’s reflections remind us of the challenges of living out our faith in a flawed world, but they also highlight the need for humility, unity, and trust in the Church Christ founded. I look forward to seeing more of his work, especially his upcoming projects that aim to explore profound spiritual themes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rYtrS5IbrQ